The Disappearing Medicare Doctors

Posted by


One of the benefits of turning 65 used to be the ability to get medical care under Medicare. Free or low-cost medical care, just when you need it the most. Then came the fiscal cliff and the Affordable Care Act. Growing older with Medicare isn’t the safety net that it used to be. The cost of Medicare coverage is going up. Benefits are being cut. And now, faced with a 27 percent cut in payments, an article in Forbes, “27% Pay Cut Or Not, More Docs To Leave Medicare in 2013,” reports physicians are likely to bail out of the Medicare program altogether.

 

And who could blame them? If you were faced with a 27-percent pay cut at your job, wouldn’t you start looking? With salaries lower now than ever, who could survive a pay cut that drastic? Costs are rising for doctors at all levels, with the high cost of high-tech equipment and insurance rates. Retailers aren’t the only ones suffering from poor sales. Faced with higher deductibles and uncovered procedures due to a changing health insurance industry, people are delaying routine checkups and opting out of high-cost or optional tests or procedures. 

 

The American Medical Association wagged its finger at Congress for putting these physicians and their Medicare patients at risk. Unpredictable funding and cuts put 47 million Medicare patients and their physicians at risk. These elderly patients are often those who need medical care to deal with conditions that come with aging. More doctor visits and prescriptions are needed to deal with illness, chronic conditions and manage pain.

 

Lower reimbursement is a reality. The government has already lowered the fee schedule from a rate of $34.0376 to $25.0008. Unlike manufacturers or other service providers, doctors can’t lower the quality or quantity of services to match price cuts. McDonald’s can shrink the size of a burger, put fewer fries in the paper container or use smaller soft drink cups to cut costs. Doctors have to maintain or increase the level of service. To hold back could be a matter of life and death. No one gets hurt from McDonald’s cutbacks. But doctors have to deliver quality service despite price cuts or lower reimbursement rates.

 

Instead of lowering services, physicians are just pulling out. According to a 2010 AMA survey, about 9,000 primary care physicians are limiting the number of Medicare patients in their practices. As aging Baby Boomers reach 65, there will be fewer physicians willing to take new patients under Medicare. Some patients may have to switch doctors to find one willing to deal with Medicare cuts at a time in their life when they need the comfort of a familiar relationship with their physician. 

 

Medicare patients aren’t the only group suffering under the Medicare cuts. Insurance companies like United Health Care and Humana need physicians to participate in networks for their Advantage Plans, which contract with Medicare to provide services. 

 

Doctors, seniors, insurance companies and the government need to get on board to focus on the most important goal of Medicare—providing quality health care for an aging population that paid into a system promising affordable health care at a time when many need it most. There have been a number of fixes passed to prevent major cuts in medical reimbursement. It will take a concerted effort from all parties to find a solution that will give seniors what they worked for and paid into to make Medicare work for years to come

 

Photo Source: Ambro / freedigitalphotos.net

Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

  • Mary Nestor-Harper
    Mary Nestor-Harper
    Your comments all call for a different kind of health reform. Healthcare has come a long way from the local doctor who took care of everyone and made his own decisions.  Thanks for all your comments.
  • Pamela H
    Pamela H
    Medical care is not the quality it was 20 years ago due to insurance persons telling doctors what tests were allowable and what meds the could prescribe for certain symptoms - even if doctor felt they were wrong. It is about socialized medicine now that is being pushed on Americans by our government "of the people, bye the people, for the people". And  we the people no longer have any say! Our Congress doesn't listen to us but they listen to pharmasutical companies as it is really about the dollar ! It is necessary for Americans to stand up for what our founding fathers wanted for this nation - FREEDOM. It is lacking now as we are told what we should want and too many secrets exist within government. We should be valueing our older citizens , not abanding them! Medicare has been doing huge amounts of wasteful spending for years so revisions are needed now to provide for people whose lives are more important!
  • Barbara P
    Barbara P
    I agree that Medicare should NOT be reduced from the consumer side. However, many MD's, other medical facilities, DME companies, pharmaceutical companies,etc. have always gotten away with charging Medicare for procedures, etc. which are  outlandish!!! I should know, I have worked in healthcare for 30 years, and now need Medicare for myself, cut corners on the suppliers, not the consumers.
  • F. Graham
    F. Graham
    the doctors are still in control. the mandate to purchase health insurance or face tax is designed for those doctors who drop out of insurance. the patient is going to pay for healthcare, no matter if he gets any or not. the patient is going to pay for healthcare whether he has insurance or not. it is a win-win situation for the stakeholders. It is disgracefully cruel to the american people.
  • David L
    David L
    Americans with money demand health care but do NOT want to pay for it. They will pay $75 to unlock a car door, but balk at paying $75 for an office visit, and oppose a fair government taxation program - like a single payer insurance plan.
  • Nathan L
    Nathan L
    Many goverment programs need an overhaul. But are we really suprised that this happened. Anything the goverment has their hands in is at best poorly managed. Look at all the programs that are available. Do a history search and watch from the moment of more goverment oversite the quick decline in effectiveness. The public blames "Corporate Greed" but forget about goverment greed. Unfortunately until we clean up the goverment we will continue to have theses problems. All of us should still be thankful that we live in this great country and are afforded the services we have. We quickly forget in other parts of the world there is no hospital or medicare or social security or any of other programs. People live with medical problems their whole life or until it kills them. Ive seen it in my volunteer experience overseas. So before you complain be grateful that you have something to complain about
  • Renata S
    Renata S
    To Theresa Z.Repeal Obama-care? I am assuming you are watching Fox and Friends. No wander you don't understand  Obama's program and Republican's politics...
  • Kenneth T
    Kenneth T
    I was certain as a young man that there wouldn't be social security or medicare by the time I could retire. Sad to say, I was right. Thanks Uncle Sam.
  •  Marie H
    Marie H
    I recently retired and have been on Medicare and a supplemental plan.  Although a rather healthy retiree, I am not looking forward to what's happening with Medicare.  How many docs will be banning these patients from their service? We need to look at our government and "leaders" and vote accordingly.  How has this happened?  It's just disheartening to those of us who have worked for many years, paid into the system, and now there is literally no reward left for us.  And why has no one looked into the outrageous costs of medications?  The pharmaceutical companies have deep pockets - why is that?  Are they greasing the pockets of our "leaders"?  Why do they continue to ruin the lives of so many poor people who cannot afford to pay the ever increasing costs for prescriptions?  Why can't we do something???
  • Richard P
    Richard P
    Short term solution: Medicare Supplement InsuranceLong term solution: Health Reform - the one that the rest of the developed world already implemented
  • James M
    James M
    Until Americans wake up and get rid of these liberal democrats running our government things will only keep getting worse.I pity the younger generations
  • Lourdes k
    Lourdes k
    i work in healthcare, now at 28 yrs. working. I believe the excessive fraud and abuse committed by some providers and the ordering of medically unnecessary  tests has driven CMS to be cost efficient, plus, if the physicians sign on to the quality measures for patients, they get financial reward, no easy money anymore, you have to show good results in your care of the patient.
  • Dr. Marlin W
    Dr. Marlin W
    The article makes excellent points. Quality and quantity of services can't be reduced by medical providers. Many of my colleagues who provide behavioral health services have been decimated by the cuts.
  • Donna B
    Donna B
    I don't believe in health insurance anymore.  I have worked hard  all my life in the health care industry and I see what a business is has become.  Peoples health should not be a matter of profit.  That is the lowest conflict of interest.  I see huge beautiful hospitals with state of the art equipment.  But people cannot get insurance or can't afford the insurance they have or can't pay their portion. So what is the point?  Who wins?  Something is way  out of balance here.
  • Kitty W
    Kitty W
    I have worked as a home health Nurse for over 25 years. Medicare when I started was unequal between hospital and home care, but did provide enough care for people to get back on their feet. Insurance companies followed the Medicare setup, and helped where Medicare stopped. I have seen primary care MD charges rise from $17 to $119 with copays from $0 - $30. MDs that were working with Medicare early on, cared more about their patients than the money they got for their services. Hospitalization was paid at 100% with no copay and patients were followed in home care for 6-9 weeks, which decreased readmissions to the hospitals. Home care was paid at 80%or less for that time frame that was medically necessary. What was considered medically necessary changed in the late 1990's, increasing hospital admissions, readmissions, and even deaths. Home care was limited in provision of care and in payment of services. It has been so sad to see the people that worked so hard to pay into a system where they have received so little. I now work as an independent contractor RN, going in to help these people get back on their feet or to go out with dignity. payment is whatever they can afford or offer in trade. I wish that the people in office to speak for their constituents would live just one year under their Medicare rules with the limited income that they have to deal with. The people making the rules and changes so far, have no idea how their constituents barely survive. Living the high life has not been a part of their lives for several generations. Where the elderly find hope and encouragement , at church, is now not OK under Medicare. If you go to church, grocery; pharmacy, or out to eat, you are not considered homebound, Doctors are picking their battles. Medicare requires more paper work and time to deal with this elderly population. They can't change it, joining it continues to spiral in a negative direction for all, and leaving it seems to be the best option. This will open the field for nurse practitioners, but an MD still has to oversee the care being given. Will we ever see the patient come first again?
  • JoseP
    JoseP
    I just have to laugh at the mere thought of "physicians or organizations talking or thinking on bailing out of Medicare because they will get paid up to 30% less"...!Haven't they heard that there are U.S.A. physicians that already earn from Medicare 50% (or less) that those who are referred to in the article as "considering to bail out", and they hold onto Medicare because it is the "highest and best payer in their payer" in their side of the woods...?  Ah, and to make the point even more compelling, this treatment has been happening in OUR United States of America since the creation of Medicare.  Where...?  Puerto Rico; what most U.S.A. citizens consider a "foreign country" due to the U.S.A. educational system - another travesty of MY "U.S.A." if you ask me. Puerto Rico IS a U.S.A. Territory (more precisely, a Commonwealth, like many States under "federal"jurisdiction).  Here Medicare pays less that what it pays in the lowest paying State; even less than in the U.S. Virgin Islands; a 15 minute flight from Puerto Rico.  Puerto Rico's health sector IS A U.S.A. Health sector; subjected to all FDA, state and federal licensing requirements, same specialty-boards requirements, Joint Commission and other "private leaches" (albeit, non-for-proffit") that have recently appeared to "accredit" health entities and/or providers anywhere in the U.S. of A.; and whose logo is a sign of "qualifications, professionalism, quality, compliance, ...".Those of us living here in this U.S.A. Island already are getting paid 30% to 50% less - and the additional 27% mentioned in the article applies to Puerto Rico as well.  And Medicare being the "highest payer" means that private insurers pay less for the same services;  and I'm talking about the SAME private insurers in the U.S. "mainland (i.e. Contiguous 48 States); Humana, United, et.al.Hence, "Don't Want to Accept Medicare", don't worry patients.  There is a new trend in town, it's called "Medical Tourism", and you can get served in the U.S.A. and your services will be paid by Medicare.  We have turned the neon sign on, Come Here, our John Hopkins, Harvard, Columbia and other trusted entities trained Medicare Providers will serve you, with THE SAME quality, requirements, medications, and compliance, in Puerto Rico.  We're open.
  • Cynthia C
    Cynthia C
    It's horrendous, but this nation cares little about the middle class, poor, or elderly, thanks to the corporate greed that CEO's of health care companies and drug companies get paid. The Republicans don't want the rich to pay their fair share in taxes, but it is okay to cut health care as mine was from Kodak. My husband, when he was alive, and I paid 20-30% taxes from his engineering  salary, and my teaching salary. Perhaps the middle class baby boomers need to protest once again, and protect young people as well. The corporate greed started about 25 to 30 years ago, and is ruining this country including our involvement in wars similar to Viet Nam.  
  • Nancy B
    Nancy B
    YOU ARE SPREADING IN CORRECT INFORMATION.  MOST ALL DOCTORS WHO TAKE MEDICARE WHO I HAVE TALKED TO PERSONALLY LIKE MEDICARE EVEN THOUGH THEY GET LESS MONEY THEY GET THEIR MONEY FAST.  JUST TWO WEEKS AFTER SUBMITTING THE BILL.  THE MONEY IS TRANSFERRED ELECTONICALLY. Check your facts before writing an article about doctors leaving Medicare
  • Maureen A
    Maureen A
    I think it is awful that people will have to die, because there is no money to help them. I must say that the doctors make alot of money, I do not think it unreasonable that they have a pay cut.
  • Gwen S
    Gwen S
    How ashaming is this article, this country was built on pride and honor, of our forefathers. Now look at us we are going down the tubes in a hurry. It's seems their are two many just standing by and letting it happen. I think the new health care system is this country next year it's going to blow many peoples mind. Hey, this article blows my mind, we all have got to stick together and advocate for what is right. Stand up for the vulerble people in our country. Stand up for what is right. Be an American and be proud.
  •  Eddie M
    Eddie M
    Nurse Practitioners can provide quality healthcare at an affordable rate. Physicians are not the only solution to the Medicare problem. NPs have been proven time and time again, able to deliver quality and affordable care comparable to physicians in primary, and internal medicine. Congress needs to realize the old outdated practice barriers are useless and I effective in solving this nation's healthcare crisis. Doing away with mandatory practice agreements between NPs and physicians, will accomplish this in waves.
  • Rita C
    Rita C
    My opinion if a Medicare recipent is pregnant it pays 100%, and they continue to pay for more pregnancies.  If they stop paying for pregnancies, maybe that would save. Medicare started for the elderly, but more is taking from them to support the ones claiming disability, can't work, but can have babies.  Medicare should only cover our ones whom are truly disabled, not having children.  If they cut paying 100% for OB care; I feel like it would save a fortune. Put it back in our elders pocket , and maybe Medicare could be there in years to come, and cover our elderly 100% again.
  • Diane S
    Diane S
    I think this is awful for the doctors who have spent thousands of dollars in their education and all of the dedication they have provided to their patients.  
  • Judy T
    Judy T
    I feel it is a great shame that this has happened-like you stated for those who have paid into it. If we are not going to have this then it should be dissolved. Especially the hand outs by the government being made to illegal citizens-the get welfare, housing, free medical. I firmly believe American benefits should belong strictly to Americans. The government probrably did this on one part of not having to pay out to the baby boomers, without medical for us most will die off and leave things more open for all the rest-from what I've seen this is the way things are headed. I read somewhere that if a person is in their 70's and develops cancer they will not be covered. Now, really, what the heck is that all about. How would the ones deciding this feel if it was a loved family member this has happened to? Thank you
  • Karen C
    Karen C
    This is terrifying. How can the Republicans be so heartless as to cut the elderly off when they have no other recourse. Obama is seriously considering "throwing the elderly under the bus" too.

Jobs to Watch